Community Working Group on standards and infrastructure for predicted effector gene matrices and lists

Outline of effector gene prediction

The aim of the working group is to define recommendations for PEG list reporting and will involve participating in a series of meetings and activities (e.g., defining use cases or benchmarking datasets). To join the working group, please contact us.

 

Previous working group meetings

May 8th, 2025 - Watch working group recording

First community workshop on standards and infrastructure for predicted effector gene lists 

 

Held September 16-17, 2024 | In-person at the Broad Institute, Cambridge MA USA | In-person at the European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK | By videoconference

 

Researchers who perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) often aggregate and integrate multiple other evidence types in order to predict the effector (causal) genes at GWAS loci (see some examples). These predictions are a valuable outcome of GWAS, but in 2024 there were currently no community standards for organizing or sharing them, and the proliferation of multiple evidence types, methods, and presentation formats carried the risk of confusion. To spark discussion on how to address this gap, we held a community workshop on the standards, infrastructure and incentives required to promote and enable sharing, interoperability, and updating of predicted effector gene lists. In preparation for the workshop, we conducted a community survey about effector gene prediction (see survey results). 

The workshop had more than 80 participants from diverse institutions and career stages. A manuscript describing its proceedings is in preparation.

 

Organizing committee of the September 2024 workshop 

  

Aims of the workshop

  • Raise awareness of the diversity of approaches to creating predicted effector gene (PEG) lists
  • Identify challenges in sharing, maintaining, and updating PEG lists
  • Ensure that PEG lists with their supporting evidence and related metadata are FAIR and relevant to the user community
  • Begin to discuss a community standard for reporting PEG lists
  • Define strategies for evaluation and collation of PEG lists
  • Identify strategies for incentivizing implementation/use of the proposed standards

     

Agenda

Monday September 16, 2024: 9am - 1pm EDT / 2pm - 6pm BST | View video recording

  • 9:00 EDT / 2:00 BST: Introduction and welcome (Noël Burtt, Knowledge Portal Network)
  • 9:20 EDT / 2:20 BST: Who’s that causal gene? Lessons learned in manually annotating 100,000 GWAS SNPs (Eric Fauman, Pfizer Inc.)
  • 10:20 EDT / 3:20 BST: Open Targets as an end user of PEG lists (Yakov Tsepilov, Open Targets)
  • 10:35 EDT / 3:35 BST: Open discussion
  • 10:45 EDT / 3:45 BST: Break
  • 10:55 EDT / 3:55 BST: Overview of current gene prioritization efforts and PEG lists (Maria Costanzo, Knowledge Portal Network)
  • 11:25 EDT / 4:25 BST: 10-minute presentations of gene prioritizations
    • Cassandra Spracklen, University of Massachusetts
    • Brent Richards, McGill University
    • Adam Butterworth, University of Cambridge
  • 12:05 EDT / 5:05 BST: Open discussion: what are the key features of each approach and how do they compare?
  • 12:30 EDT / 5:30 BST: How ClinGen handles framework standardization with input from many invested users (Marina DiStefano, ClinGen)
  • 1:00 EDT / 6:00 BST: Adjourn

Tuesday September 17, 2024: 9am - 1pm EDT / 2pm - 6pm BST | View video recording

  • 9:00 EDT / 2:00 BST: GWAS Catalog’s experience developing GWAS standards (Laura Harris, GWAS Catalog)
  • 9:15 EDT / 2:15 BST: Curation and display of PEG lists in the Knowledge Portals (Maria Costanzo, Knowledge Portal Network)
  • 9:25 EDT / 2:25 BST: Curation and display of gold standard lists at Open Targets (Xiangyu Jack Ge, Open Targets)
  • 9:35 EDT / 2:35 BST: Open discussion: advantages/disadvantages of PEG list presentations
  • 9:50 EDT / 2:50 BST: Results of community survey (Maria Costanzo, Knowledge Portal Network)
  • 10:00 EDT / 3:00 BST: Standardization requirements for use of PEG lists as input for computational and AI methods (Jason Flannick, Boston Children’s Hospital)
  • 10:15 EDT / 3:15 BST: Break
  • 10:25 EDT / 3:25 BST: Proposal for PEG list standards (Yue Ji and Laura Harris, GWAS Catalog)
  • 10:40 EDT / 3:40 BST: 40-minute breakout group discussions about the proposed standards. Guiding questions will be provided.
  • 11:20 EDT / 4:20 BST: Breakout groups report back; further discussion in the larger group
  • 12:40 EDT / 5:40 BST: Wrap up (All organizers)
  • 1:00 EDT / 6:00 BST: Adjourn